#header-inner img {margin: 0 auto !important; #header-inner {text-align: Center ;} Fiji Coupfourpointfive: Chaudry's millions classic example of why regime wants media decree

You can now comment as 'Annonymous'.


Saturday, April 10, 2010

Chaudry's millions classic example of why regime wants media decree

Remember the dreaded and un-elected Taliban when they were in power in Afghanistan. Their declared and publicly stated aim was to protect the sanctity of their women, so they professed. In order to achieve that aim, they promised to create a viable environment where the chasteness and dignity of Afghan women was to be once again, under Talibanistic decrees, being sacrosanct.

They made Afghan women to forcibly wear the burqa in public because the face of a poor and down-trodden Afghan woman was a source of corruption for men not related to the opposite sex. The rest is history. Any violation of the oppressive and undemocratic Talibanistic decrees was to result in flogging and execution, and there are countless statistics that the punishments were zealously carried out as decreed.

Now, in Fiji, the Bainimarama government, led by its Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, has brought out the draft Media Industry Development Decree 2010 which provides for the establishment of a Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) to “encourage, promote and facilitate” news media organisations and services at a “high standard” and a statutory Media Tribunal to judge complaints against media.

 Like those poor and abused Afghan women, we are told that the Media Decree is needed to protect ‘Mother Fiji’ from the Fiji media, which is corrupting the moral fibre of the nation. While Bainimarama wants the media to be loyal to Fiji (to mouth and laud his actions), his chief law-maker Sayed-Khaiyum said the decree would establish a media code of standards in ethics and practice while emphasising “fair, accurate and responsible reporting”. Among many sinister recommendations, but one already in practice, is the demand in the draft Media Decree that all news reports publish a “byline” identifying the author.

And here we come to ‘Chaudhry’s Secret Millions’ which carried Victor Lal's by-line for nearly 14 months in the Fiji SUN (2007-2008) but a story which the interim regime of Bainimarama chose to ignore or investigative. Instead, it went on to religiously defend its Finance Minister until the Fiji Times named Chaudhry as the Minister.

The next day LaI rovided concrete evidence to back up his investigative story, and indirectly saved the Fiji Times from Chaudhry’s billion dollar libel writ against that newspaper. This particular story is a classic example of how we will never, if the vindictive Media Decree is made into law, be able to read a similar expose in the Fiji media. It will be the death of investigative journalism, which is already non-existent under present media censorship.

 In other words, Chaudhry would have been one of the first, if not greatest beneficiaries, of the media decree if it had been in existence when the Fiji Sun first began running the story about a Government Minister and Tax Matters. He would have simply lodged a complaint against the Fiji Sun. For after all, Bainimarama had refused to dismiss him as Finance Minister, claiming the media had a hidden agenda against his interim government, and against Chaudhry.

And Lal would have been jailed, along with the publisher Russell Hunter, and the Fiji Sun fined thousands of dollars under this Media Decree- for disclosing Chaudhry's millions in a secret Australian bank account.

3 comments:

  1. So what's the Cobra (Chaudhry) doing these days - where's he gone?

    ReplyDelete
  2. So this media decree is just another media bashing for exposing Chaudhry's millions of money that were for refugee camp victims and administration at Lautoka Girmit Centre; Khaiyum's house sale at extra $200K plus value as side track corruption with businessman that fell under some sort of business licence, etc; and Major Aziz's millions payout to his military council as back pay or "bonus" to show what it means to be in power!!!

    Did anyone during consultation ask if these exposures are the types of things that now cannot be printed under media decree?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1.13pm-Still coiled around the millions and bloging-C4

    ReplyDelete

Please verify to prove you're not a robot.