Tuesday, December 7, 2010

US visa denials could leave pained regime twiddling thumbs

TWIDDLING THUMBS: Kubuabola and Saumatua
The wings of the likes of the widely-travelled illegal  foreign afffairs minister, Inoke Kubuabola (pictured left in this picture), may well have been clipped, if the US decision on visas continues. 

The ubiquitous Kubuabola has a habit of popping up in many places and was one of the last from the regime to be in the US this year (remember that staged picture of him with Clinton?), along with Voreqe Bainimarama.
But it appears the US has taken a stand with the dictatorship and is refusing visas. Three have been denied in the past two weeks - to the illegal chief justice Anthony Gates, the illegal Fisheries Minister, Viliame Naupoto, and the Minister for Local Government and Environment Colonel Samuela Saumatua (pictured above with Kubuabola).

The latter was supposed to leave for Mexico today to attend the 16th Conference on Climate Change. 

The regime, especially Sayed-Khaiyum, is taking the rejections hard, describing the US embassy decisions as deplorable.

The US Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, said when she visited New Zealand and Australia recently that America would join forces with the two countries to persuade Suva to return Fiji to democracy. Let's hope the visas is the start of that campaign.

Labels: ,

Sayed-Khaiyum spewing more lies

The dictatorship's Attorney-General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, is quite clearly suffering from Foot in the Mouth Disease, which is evident from his verbal defecation following the United States refusal to grant illegal Chief Justice Anthony Gates a visa.

Gates was to attend the 9th Session of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

1) Sayed-Khaiyum claims Fiji has made progress to ensure compliance with the Rome Statue through promulgation of the Crimes Decree, which now categorises genocide and crimes against humanity as criminal offences. It is a case of pot calling the kettle black. The regime continues to trample on fundamental freedoms and human rights in Fiji, protected by unlawful Decrees that are being legislated by Sayed-Khaiyum.

2) Sayed-Khaiyum says Fiji, as a responsible sovereign State, takes international obligations and responsibilities with utmost sincerity. His lie is as visible as his fake personality. What about the betrayal of commitments from the regime via  Sayed-Khaiyum, M P Chaudhry and Epeli Nailatikau, made in April 2007 to the European Union to hold elections in Fiji by March 2009? What about a similar commitment for elections to be held by first quarter of 2009, made by dictator Frank Bainimarama to the Pacific Islands Forum in October 2007? Can Sayed-Khaiyum say that as a sovereign State, the regime that he serves took these responsibilities and obligations with utmost sincerity?

3) Sayed Khaiyum is assuming the United States Embassy will give insufficient time for visa processing as the answer for the refusal! On what basis is he making this assumption?

4) In his attempt to dramatise the issue, Sayed Khaiyum has revealed that he along with the regime's permanent secretary for Fisheries, were also refused visas to travel to the United States this year. Why was Sayed-Khaiyum quiet all this time?

5) Sayed Khaiyum has labelled the US stand deplorable, undignified, demeaning, arbitrary, arrogant and contemptible. This is the harshest language ever used to criticise a member of the international community, and one who has been Fiji's ally.

Do Sayed-Khaiyum, Frank Bainimarama and the military regime therefore have the guts to walk their talk and inflict upon the United States, the treatment that they dished out to Australia and New Zealand for so-called  interference and visa related issues in conformity to their sanctions, by expelling their diplomats?

In June 2007, the regime expelled NZ High Commissioner Michael Green on the basis of interference, which the regime did not specify. In December 2008, the regime expelled acting NZ High Commissioner Caroline McDonald after the son of then permanent secretary to the President (Iloilo) Rupeni Nacewa was refused a student visa to study in New Zealand.

In November 2009, the regime expelled deputy NZ High Commissioner Todd Cleaver and Australian High Commissioner James Batley after accusing both countries of telling Sri Lankans recruited as magistrates and judges by the regime that they would be subjected to travel bans to New Zealand and Australia.

In July this year, the regime expelled Australia's acting High Commissioner Sarah Roberts after accusing her of interference and of influencing Vanuatu to refuse to hand over of the Melanesian Spearhead Group chairmanship to Frank Bainimarama.

The decision by the United States Embassy to refuse the regime's CJ Anthony Gates, Sayed-Khaiyum and permanent secretary for Fisheries travel visas to United States is far more serious on the regime's anti-Fiji behaviour measuring scale.

We will wait and see if the regime and Sayed-Khaiyum dish out similar treatment to US Ambassador Steven McGann and kick him out like five diplomats from Australia and New Zealand, or show the world that the strong condemnation of the US is just showmanship and verbal defecation.


Our final assessment is Sayed Khaiyum will eat his own vomit and come up with excuses to explain his harmless barrage of attack against the United States.


Pictures: Sarah Roberts (top) and Todd Cleaver (below). 

Labels: ,

FDFM answers concerns about planned Sukuna Park march

The call for people to march against the military government has caused a lot of debate since the plans were revealed last week on this blog and elsewhere. Part of the reason for the controversy is the lack of information about who is behind the Sukuna Park march and what the motives are. The Fiji Democracy Freedom Movement of Australia says it is supporting the Save Fiji Movement march. Its spokesperson, Usaia Peter Waqatairewa, answers Coupfourpointfive's questions about its own march in Sydney on Sunday and the planned Fiji march.

1) Did the march in Sydney go ahead yesterday and how many people attended? Yes, the march did go ahead and about sixty people attended


2) Where did supporters come from and did they include non-Fijians, eg Australians etc? Our supporters are mainly indigenous Fijians, part Europeans and an Indofijian, plus Mark Manning


3) Does FDFM feel it achieved its goal? We have achieved our goals by having the march go ahead and later on the rally at Martin Place where we gave people the opportunity to speak out. We achieve our goals by being able to march and demonstrate against Voreqe Bainimarama’s regime on the 4th anniversary of the coup. We achieve our goals because most of us left Fiji after the coup and in this great democracy we were able to sing, march and chant out our views of not agreeing with the coup and Voreqe Bainimarama’s dictatorship. These are the things we cannot do at home. The freedom to freely express ourselves and the freedom to gather and protest peacefully, and the freedom of association as members of an organised body of people. Australians took pictures of us and people clapped in support as we walked from the town hall to Martins Place via Hyde Park and Macquarie Street, past the NSW Parliament House.


4) Regarding the Sukuna Park march:


a) Why is FDFM supporting it? We support the right for people to freely express their views and frustration with the current regime. It is the regime’s obligation to ensure their safety but not block them from the basic right to march and their right to free speech, expression, and free fathering.


b) What support is there for the march that you know of? I do not even know who is organising the march but I do support the spirit in which they want to march.


c) Some people are saying key groups like SDL and the Methodist Church are not aware of the march ... what does FDFM have to say about this? If they want to march that is their basic human rights; it is our duty as rights advocate to encourage them. If the Military wants to beat the hell out of them than that is their prerogative and they will have to face the consequence of their action on the international arena. These people are not armed and it is the military that would be the aggressor. Bainimarama and Khaiyum must be aware that the world is watching and do not regret if they end up in the ICC one day. If the Methodist Church and SDL is not aware, then they must try to be aware because if they are not going to organise a march when the people want to march, then people will form another group to do it for them.


d) Does FDFM have concerns about this? Of course, we are concerned because we are mindful of the animalistic aggressive nature of the security forces and the people illegally in charge such as Khaiyum and Bainimarama and the last thing we want to see is people getting hurt but let us not lose sight of the fact that it is the people’s right to march and the PER and this government are the illegal elements not the marchers. This is an illegal government and no one should recognise them. And they have no right to go and start beating up anyone.


3) Does FDFM know the identity of the organiser or organisers of the Save Fiji Movement? We have no idea apart from what we read on the blog.


4) Is FDFM okay about asking people to break PER by marching? We are mindful of the thugs in government and we have not nor initiated this march nor asked people to break the PER. This question should be directed towards the organisers of the march.


5) Does it have any concerns about people getting beaten or worse for attending the march? People have a right to make up their mind and march. These people are adults and can make up their own mind. Let us not patronise them. However we are very concerned that the armed thugs in government will beat them and commit further human rights atrocities. These are fathers and mothers and they have had enough of the hardship brought about by the illegal regime and one must be mindful of the fact that we are dealing with human beings. We are dealing with people who are fathers, mothers and children of someone.


6) If the military is behind the march, is this not a concern for the Secretariat? Why does the military need people to march when it has guns? That is a big concern of ours but if the military are ware and want the people to march then the split in government and the military camp is far bigger then we initially thought. There are obviously certain elements within the RFMF who have had enough and would like to indirectly tell Khaiyum and Bainimarama that they have had enough and are not prepared to do their dirty work anymore by beating up any would-be marchers.


7) Have you seen the petition that is supposedly being prepared for Nailatikau? No but we are preparing one ourselves and already we have had fifty signatures on it.


8) Does the FDFM believe Nailatikau will act on it? We don’t know but given the purported powers given to him under the Executive Authority Decree if 2009 and if he still has any conscience and morals as a high chief of Kubuna, then for once think of the people and the Vanua and do something.

Labels: ,

Monday, December 6, 2010

Khaiyum stung by US refusal to grant visa to Gates

BIBLE BASHER: Gates taking oath.
The might of the Bible and the weight of Fiji law as it is today wasn't enough to get the country's illegal chief justice into the United States to attend a United Nations meeting.


Gates, to the outrage of the illegal government, has been denied a visa by US authorities.

He had hightailed it to New York to participate in the four-day 9th Session of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court, being held at the UN headquarters.


But his questionable past seems to have been a non-negotiable issue for US authorities. Gates has dual British and Australian citizenship but was one of the first on board after Bainimarama and Josefa Iloilo illegally abrogated the Constitution last year. 

A furious Khaiyum took the US authorities decision hard.  In a statement this afternoon, he said: "Clearly, the failure of the US embassy is specious and demeaning. In diplomatic language, the non-issuance of visa on time effectively tantamounts to a rejection. 

"One wonders whether the same discourteous treatment would have been meted out to a Chief Justice of a more significant State than the small Pacific island country of Fiji.

"This behaviour was arbitrary and arrogant and inconsistent with the spirit behind the purpose of this meeting of State parties. It is much to be
deprecated. No courts treat their litigants or stakeholders in such a way."

The realities of being part of a dictatorship regime is obviously hitting home. 

For the full impact, we print here Khaiyum's statement:

1. The Government of the Republic of Fiji strongly denounces the failure by the embassy of the United States of America to provide the Chief Justice of Fiji, Mr. Justice Anthony Gates, with a visa to represent Fiji at the 9th Session of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ("Rome Statute"), which is being held at the headquarters of the United Nations in New York from 6 to 10 December 2010. The invitation to this meeting was extended to Fiji by the International Criminal Court ("ICC").

2. Earlier this May, the Attorney-General with Mr. Luke Daunivalu, Fijis' Deputy Representative to the United Nations, had represented Fiji at the meeting for the review of the Rome Statute, which was held in Uganda and was attended by all the States parties to the Rome Statute, as well as a large array of international judges, jurists and international and criminal law experts.

3.  In the last year, Fiji has made substantial progress to ensure full compliance with the Rome Statute, with the implementation of the Crimes Decree ("the Decree"). The Decree contains modernised and internationally accepted provisions on various offences against the international order, including the offence of genocide, crimes against humanity, trafficking in persons and children, people smuggling, piracy, slavery and sexual servitude.

4.  Given such an advanced accomplishment with respect to its laws, which numerous other countries are yet to achieve, it was imperative that Fiji was suitably represented by our senior-most judicial officer. As such, the Fijian Government, at the invitation of the ICC, had nominated the Chief Justice to represent Fiji at this important meeting. The ICC secretariat, in consultation with Fiji's representative to the UN, had already confirmed an allocated time for Justice Gates to make a presentation on behalf of Fiji, on Tuesday morning (7 December 2010).

5.  It is most unfortunate and gravely disappointing that Fiji was, yet again, frustrated in its attempts to adequately make representations to this meeting of the ICC, including meetings of other international organisations in which Fiji is active participant, as a result of this contemptible conduct on the part of the US embassy.

6. Fiji, as a responsible sovereign State, and the Fijian Government take international responsibilities and obligations with utmost sincerity. In relation to the Rome Statute, Fiji is entitled to inform and update this meeting of eminent jurists and international law experts about the developments and progress made by Fiji in relation to the implementation of the Rome Statute

7.  The Chief Justice was unable to attend this meeting because the American authorities failed to issue him with an entry visa. His application was initiated and lodged with the US embassy within sufficient time.

8. Whilst no formal message declining the visa has been issued, as sual it will be said there was insufficient time to process the application, or that the visa would have been issued eventually.

9.  It is noted that this deplorable and undignified stand has recently been taken by the US embassy in relation to applications for visa by the Attorney-General, who had in October been scheduled to attend the UN General Assembly with the Prime Minister. Similarly, the Permanent Secretary for Fisheries & Forests has also not been given a visa to represent Fiji at the annual session of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, scheduled in Hawaii from 5 to 10 December 2010.

10.    Clearly, the failure of the US embassy is specious and demeaning. In diplomatic language, the non-issuance of visa on time effectively tantamounts to a rejection. One wonders whether the same discourteous treatment would have been meted out to a Chief Justice of a more significant State than the small Pacific island country of Fiji.

11. This behaviour was arbitrary and arrogant and inconsistent with the spirit behind the purpose of this meeting of State parties. It is much to be deprecated. No courts treat their litigants or stakeholders in such a way.

12. Fiji will now be represented at this meeting by its Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Mr. Peter Thomson and his deputy, Mr. Luke Daunivalu.

Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum
(Illegal) Attorney General

Labels: ,

Two more DPP lawyers get the boot

The DPP deputy - Ratu David Toganivalu - and another lawyer, Ana Tuiketei, have been fired. 

Both were given termination letters today by the illegal solictor general Christopher Pryde.

Toganivalu was involved in a number of the regime's major cases, including that of the eight men accused of plotting to kill the self-appointed prime minister Frank Bainimarama.

Tuiketei will be remembered for the more recent case involving the Fiji Labour Party leader Mahendra Chaudhry. 
She last week opposed an application by Chaudhry to access his Sydney bank accounts but unbelievably decided not to oppose his travel plans.

Chauhdry was today granted permission to travel to Australia to seek medical treatment from December the 20th to January the 6th but has been put on fresh bail of $1,000.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Lest we forget: Baini's promises when he toppled Qarase

Baini in 2006: "We trust that the new government will lead us into peace and prosperity and mend the ever widening racial divide that currently besets our multicultural nation."

Four years ago today Frank Bainimarama began his 'clean-up campaign', after months of speculation and rumours and an ultimatum for Qarase to meet the military's demands or resign.

It began on December 4 with the army confiscating ammunition at the Police headquarters in Nasinu then removing weapons from the armoury at Nasova Police Academy in Suva.

Shoppers and workers in Suva city had already got a whiff of what was coming via the coconut wireless and shops started to close as memories of the 2000 coup re-surfaced. Businesses were torched and looted during during that coup following a march by Nationalists.

Chaos broke out in Suva city as people scrambled to get taxis and buses to get home. After three coups in Fiji, people had come to know the rumours were usually right.

International and local media rushed to Nasinu to get pictures and to follow the unfolding drama. While there, they discovered the Nasova police base was being taken over and rushed back there.

At Nasova, soldiers packed their military trucks with weapons from the armoury and left. A few armed soldiers stayed to guard the armoury. Ironically, a police graduation was taking place on the grounds. The new recruits marched as the soldiers took over their armoury.

The Acting Police commissioner at the time, Moses Driver, called a press conference and said the military action was unlawful but Bainimarama said it had to be done to stop the police and army from fighting each other.

Roadblocks were set up at various places around Suva, including at Government House. Qarase tried to avoid the checkpoints by helicoptering to his home.

The next morning (December 5), soldiers surrounded the offices of government ministers and placed them under house arrest after taking their cars and phones.

Outside Qarase's house, media waited to see how the military would arrest the SDL leader, who was holed up inside. Police guards were outside.

A van with 3 soldiers drove up to his driveway and tried to enter the compound. They tried to convince police to let them through, but the latter refused. The van left.
 

Half an hour later two truckloads of soldiers arrived. They closed off the street to Qarase's house and chased the media away.

Qarase's supporters from the Methodist church arrived and started praying and singing. Everyone waited.
 
Frank Bainimarama was meanwhile meeting with President, Josefa Iloilo, who signed a legal order dissolving Parliament.
 
But a press release from Iloilo's office that same day said he did not endorse the coup and the soldiers were acting against his orders.

On December 6 at a press conference at Queen Elizabeth Barracks, Bainimarama announced that he had taken control of the government and he had executive authority to run the country.

In his speech he accused Qarase of corruption and of being racist:

"As of today, the military has taken over the government ...RFMF over the years have been raising security concerns with the government, in particular the 
introduction of controversial bills, and policies that have divided the nation now and will have very serious consequences to our future generations.

"These concerns have been conveyed to the Prime Minister in all fairness and sincerity with the country’s interest at heart.

"Apparently, all RFMF concerns were never accepted with true spirit. All my efforts to the government were to no avail. Instead, they turned their attention on the RFMF itself. 

"Despite my advice, they tried to remove me and create dissension within the ranks of the RFMF; the institution that stood up and redirected the Nation from the path of doom that the Nation was being led to in 2000.

"Qarase has already conducted a ‘silent coup’ through bribery, corruption and introduction of controversial Bill.

"Our position can be differentiated from the Qarase Government which for example through the passing of the Reconciliation, Qoliqoli and Land Claims will undermine the Constitution.

"When the country is stable and the Electoral Rolls and other machineries of Elections have been properly reviewed and amended, elections will be held. 

"We trust that the new government will lead us into peace and prosperity and mend the ever widening racial divide that currently besets our multicultural nation."

Labels: ,

Friday, December 3, 2010

FDFM: 'Regime does not have resources to arrest and detail 10 or 20 thousand people'

Australia's Democracy Movement is citing the military blow-out as a major example of why the self-appointed Bainimarama government cannot continue to run Fiji.

In an email promoting the Save Fiji Movement march at Sukuna Park in Suva next Friday, the Sydney-based group says the military will have busted its annual budget by $700,000,000 if it's allowed to continue until 2014.

 
Quoting the work of Dr Nadan Warsey of the University of the South Pacific, it says his calculations reveal the huge cost the country is paying for military rule.

 
"That is $700 million for unproductive periodically coup conducting soldiers. Which means $700 million less for education, health, social welfare, poverty alleviation, and national infrastructure development – not to mention the enormous damage done to the national economy."


Two protest marches are now planned in the next two weeks for people to rally against the self-appointed government of Bainimarama. 


The first is in Sydney and planned for this Sunday (December 5) to co-incide with the fourth anniversary of Bainimarama's December 6 coup.  

The second is scheduled for next Friday (December 10), noon at Sukuna Park in Suva.

The email from FDFM urges people to spread the news about the marches and to attend: "....Come let us all march together in Suva on Friday, 10th of December. Remember the regime do not have the resources to arrest and detail 10 or 20 thousand people."

Labels: ,

Second march aimed at ousting Baini announced

A second march aimed at showing the discontent of Fiji people against the self-appointed military government has been announced this morning.

The march is being organised by the Fiji Democracy and Freedom Movement in Australia and is scheduled for this Sunday (December the 5th) in Sydney to coincide with the fourth anniversary of the December 6 coup.

Yesterday, a frontman for Save Fiji Movement revealed the group is organising a march for next Friday in Suva, aimed at delivering a petition to the illegally appointed president, Epeli Nailatikau, urging him to dismantle the Bainimarama regime.

In a statement, the Fiji Democracy Movement says it wants members of the public who are concerned about what is happening in Fiji to join the Fijian Community in the protest march.

It says the people of Fiji are fed up with the lies and failure of Commodore Bainimarama and his illegal government.


Quote:..."Given that he has lost most of his supporters since 2006, Commodore Bainimarama should do the honourable thing and hand the power over to a civilian caretaker government that will take the nation to general election."

The freedom movement says since 2006 lives have been lost and thousands have been beaten by security forces. "Basic human rights has been removed and given the gagged media since April last year, people have been suffering in silence."

The statement goes on to say: "The illegal regime’s report card, after four years, does not reveal any hope that they are capable of governing. According to a report by Professor Wadan Narsey of the University of the South Pacific this week, since December 2006:

a) investment level has dropped 15%
b) National savings has also dropped dramatically
c) There has been negative economic growth every year since 2007
d) They have aimed to reign in fiscal debt and public debt but, as a matter of fact, they have been increasing it consistently with military budget blow outs and increases in national budget allocations since 2007
e) The Military has again received the lions shares proposed for next year’s budget with a further $8 million increase to purchase new weapons
f) Inflation has shot through the roof with a 20% and will further increase with the proposed 2.5% VAT increase next year
g) And unemployment and poverty is a major issue with 70% of those living in poverty are rural dwellers and it now stands at 38% of the population.

The freedom movement says it's believed the cost of the coup since 2006 is at least $2,000 million plus.

"The illegal reign of Commodore Bainimarama and his cronies has been a total failure and we are asking everyone out there with any sense of human rights, justice and human dignity to come join with the Sydney Fijian Community in protest this Sunday."

Labels: ,

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Bainimarama's Kaba looming as Nailatikau statesmanship set to be tested

By Jone Baledrokadroka

Emperor Napoleon met his defeat at Waterloo. The victory of the Duke of Wellington and Prussian forces at this decisive battle heralded the end to the tyrant's rule.
 
In Fiji, the victory of Christian forces at the battle of Kaba can be said to mirror the battle of Waterloo in the course of history. Both 19th Century battles shaped modern politics in Fiji and the western world, respectively.

 
At Kaba in 1855, King George of Tonga’s forces aided the vunivalu of Bau Ratu Seru Cakobau’s forces and soundly defeated rebels sending the rest fleeing through the mangroves.

 
A modern Kaba type showdown is looming. History repeating itself. As at the battle of Kaba, once close allies have bizarrely aligned their forces against each other in the past week. Unfortunately, for Fiji more instability seems to be on the horizon and have been heard in recent days from within the regime.

 
The old Tonga-Baun elite have again aligned against the sick ‘Napoleon’ from across the Kaba point in Kiuva and his core of military officers and brain, Aiyaz Khaiyum, struggle for power that began with Police Commissioner Esala Teleni’s resignation and the taking of ‘leave’ of Lt Col Rokolui Mara and Brigadier Pita Driti is coming to a head. 

The split in military ranks in the past week have been shown with an $8 million military budget increase going $6.1 million to the Navy and $1.9 million to the Army.
 
Some have, judging by the direction of the wind, changed tack, Ratu Epeli Ganilau of note. Perhaps blood is thicker than his best mate and dictator’s promises it seems. 

 
Soldiers from Naitasiri and Tailevu – the last traditional warrior resort of old - have been bought off by promotions to prop up the ailing dictator and his crumbling regime.

 
President Ratu Epeli Nailatikau, like his great ancestors at the battle of Kaba, literally has the future of Fiji in the palm of his right hand. His chiefly royal blood, military forbearance and hopefully statesmanship will be tested over the coming week.

 
The big question then is, will our ailing dictator meet his Waterloo by Christmas? Or to paraphrase, will he meet his Kaba before Kirisimasi namaki?

 
Ironically, with history being made by Tonga’s first  liberal democratic elections this week, an iliberal zombie of a nation will be hoping the Tonga-Baun alliance  prevails.

 
An old alliance that gave Fiji, Christmas may well shepherd the nation back to democracy.

Labels: , ,

Email: Save Fiji Movement planning march and petition to oust military government

A group calling itself Save Fiji Movement says it's organising a nationwide march aimed at getting the president to dismantle the self-appointed government of Frank Bainimarama.

The group says the march will be held next Friday (December 10) and will end with a petition to the president, Epeli Nailatikau.

An email from the group says marchers will ask Nailatikau (above) to appoint a new commander, set a time for elections, address the financial crisis and appoint an interim government.

The march is planned for Sukuna Park in Suva at noon.

The email says "this move will go on regardless of any
threat. We have solid backing of “voices of people of Fiji”.

It says those involved "have passed today that this march will unseat Frank
and break the army apart and president will have “to listen."

"This march will be for everyone even army and police officers to save the country from going down the drain and for our children."

The group has not identified who is behind it or who its supporters are.

Labels:

More fall out over Budget

They were once suckers of the illegal regime. One was protecting the back of other. Now, they can't agree on the 2011 Budget. The illegal A-G Aiyaz sayed Khaiyum, who delivered the Budget in his capacity as acting Finance Minister while the dictator was undergoing medical treatment in China, has lashed out at his former treasonous partner in crime and dictator's interim Finance Minister Mahendra Chaudhry.
Khaiyum has dismissed statements by Chaudhry that the increase in Value Added Tax in the budget last week is a devastating blow to the poor, and the low and medium income earners.

Chaudhry also told New Zealand media that once again people are being made to pay the price for indiscriminate government borrowings.

Khaiyum said the statements are misguided as there are record targeted assistance programs for the unfortunate in the budget.

He also said that people should not forget the 9 percent reduction in the prices of many food items through the Commerce Commission price determination.

He said the fundamentals of the economy and financial systems are now being put right.

Khaiyum believes the political parties like the Fiji Labour Party are just trying to use the issue as a political point scoring exercise.

Labels: , ,

Chaudhry wants passport and access to Aussie bank accounts

CHAUDHRY: FijiLive pic
The DDP's Office is asking the High Court to make sure Mahendra Chaudhry can't access funds kept in his Australian accounts if he's granted permission to travel to Australia.

Fiji media say Chaudhry has asked the court to allow him to have his passport so he can travel to Australia for medical treatment.

DPP lawyer Ana Tuiketei has not opposed the application for Chaudhry to travel but says the Fiji Court needs to make sure the Fiji Labour Party leader can't access the funds kept in his Sydney accounts, because they are subject to the charges and on-going investigations.

Tuiketei also argued the former Prime MInister is not entitled to unconditional bail because he needs to be treated like any other accused persons.

Chaudhry's defence lawyer and son, Rajendra Chaudhry, cliamed the bail act allows an accused to access funds for various reasons. According to FijiVillage he also said his client will need to access the funds to pay his medical bills.

He gave an assurance that the monies to be used will be for travel, medical bills and other expenses within reasonable bounds and his client will not tamper with the funds as alleged.
 
High Court Judge Justice Daniel Goundar also questioned Rajendra Chaudhry why his client's passport should be permanently released to him.

He questioned on how the court can guarantee that someone prominent, with power and money will not abscond.

Rajendra Chaudhry argued that this could lead to the presumption that prominent people are treated differently when it comes to bail conditions. 


Judge Goundar is expected to make a ruling next Monday.-source Fiji Village and FijiLive
  

Labels: ,

2011 Budget Oscars: burdening future generations

By Professor Wadan Narsey
Another year, another illegal Acting Minister of Finance presenting Budget Estimates for 2011 stating “as approved by the Fiji government”.

Without a Parliament, this is now the only reporting exercise to the Fiji taxpayers, who will fork out $1746 million to fund Bainimarama’s plans for 2011.

As always, the media and taxpayers only think about the little bits taken from them in taxes, and the little bits given here and there in benefits, and strange reversals in economic policies such as protectionism.
They can rarely look at the long-term Big Picture that annual budgets add up to (and it does not help that articles like this can never get past the censors in local media).

Unfortunately also, regardless of the alleged principles of accountability preached  by the Charter, this military government will not release the Auditor-General’s Reports on how our tax money was spent in the past, or those Reports explaining why $300 million more of our tax money will be pumped into propping up the Fiji Sugar Corporation; or the Reports on the hundreds of millions lost at Natadola and Momi due to this military government’s actions.

Not that any one from the business community and the accounting and auditing firms would be asking such pesky questions of this military government.

Neither would they be asking the Acting Finance Minister,  Aiyaz Khaiyum, to explain why his extravagant claims about the macro objectives of the Bainimarama government, is totally contradicted by the numbers given in his own 2011 Budget Supplement.

If the 2011 Budget Supplement numbers are correct, then the following will be the Record Card for the Bainimarama government over the last four years.

The Bainimarama Record Card
Judge this military government by its own key macro-economic targets, stated clearly in their 2011 Budget Supplement (paragraph 3.3, page 18):
*    Raising investment levels to 25 percent of GDP. (FAIL)
*    Growing the economy by 5 percent annually; (FAIL)
*    Reducing the rate of poverty to a negligible level; (FAIL)
*    Reducing fiscal deficits; (FAIL) (opposite being done)
*    Reducing Government debt; (FAIL) (opposite being done)
*    Maintaining inflation at around 2-3 percent on average; (FAIL) (inevitably)
*    Maintaining foreign exchange reserves at 4-5 months of import cover; (C grade)

Despite having complete control of Fiji for the last four years, the Bainimarama government has utterly failed to achieve any of their own first six targets.   They are not likely to achieve them either over the next four years.  For some targets, they are blatantly and dangerously doing the opposite.

Investment as % of GDP
 
Fiji budget
 

Look at Graph 1.  Investment had risen briefly to 25 percent in 1999, but the 2000 coup by soldiers reversed that trend, with another dive taking place after 2006.  In 2010 it is almost certainly 15 percent or less.
All the indicators (building permits approved, savings ratios, etc) indicate that this ratio will not rise given that investor confidence is at an all-time low.

Most people hardly ever see the statistics behind Graph 2 on the right – National Savings as percentage of GDP (estimated by the World Bank, but not by Fiji). National Savings is roughly National Income minus Consumption – Net Outflows.

One can see the decline setting in after 1987, then again after 2000. For the first time in the history of Fiji, this ratio became negative over 2007 and 2008, probably because of capital flight by locals,  foreigners and potential investors, over fear of impending devaluation.  Graph 1 in fact follows the trends shown by Graph 2.

Fiji budget graph 2 

Such capital flights (by foreigners and locals alike) and loss of investor confidence are encouraged by military decrees appropriating assets, military decrees preventing aggrieved persons from taking their cases to court, expulsion of CEOs of large corporations, deportation of newspaper editors, and imposition of draconian media censorship.  In such a climate you are unlikely to see investment rise to 25 percent of GDP.

It is to be expected that that large corporations will try to avoid taxes by whatever means available (including transfer pricing), while waging strong PR campaigns to win public sympathy.  But the solution for illegal activities must surely be through legal redress.  The solution for more equitable tax payments from a vitally important export company, is surely negotiation in good faith. Not expulsion of CEOs or large, sudden and discriminatory increases in resource taxes.

Negative economic growth
The 2011 Budget documents confirm what most of us have been fearing- that the growth rate for 2010 is going to be (now estimated to be 0.1 percent) far below the optimistic rates being projected by the Reserve Bank.

Fiji budget Graph 3 

Graph 3 shows clearly what has happened since 2006 when Bainimarama took over. The top straight line represents what a modest 2.2 percent growth would have given us between 2006 and 2010. The black line is what the Bainimarama government has actually achieved for us: the GDP in 2010 was even lower than in 2006.

The ever-widening gap represents a loss in national income of over $1,250 million in real 2005 terms (and more in current dollars), with a corresponding loss of potential government revenue and expenditure of more than $300 million.

Having lost the tax-payers these huge amounts, the Bainimarama government pats itself on the back (with the jovial support of business tycoons) for $10 million given out for food vouchers and $12 million for bus fare subsidies.

Let us not talk about the impact on poverty, or Father Kevin Barr’s long-postponed Wages Councils Orders following underhand pressures by employers.

Fiscal Deficits and Public Debt: Lies?
 
Fiji budget graph 4
 

Possibly the biggest and most damaging con-trick that this Military Government is pulling on Fiji’s tax-payers is the continuing claim that it is planning to reduce Fiscal Deficits and the Public Debt.

On the contrary, the numbers in the 2011 Budget Supplement show that fiscal deficits have remained large (ie this Military Government keeps spending more than it receives in revenue).  Consequently, the Public Debt has risen from 2006 to 2010 by a massive $515 million.

Worse still, the Budget Supplement numbers clearly show (Table 3.1, page 19) that this military government is planning to further increase the public debt between 2010 and 2013 by another $576 million.  That is, by 2013, they will have increased the Public Debt by more than a billion dollars (see Graph 4).

This is a billion dollars that this illegal and irresponsible m ilitary Government wants to pass on to the future generation, to pay for their mistakes of today.

We remember that the Qarase Government also expanded the Public Debt between 2000 and 2006 by more than a billion dollars- some on infrastructure, but the rest to cover their Agricultural Scam, the over-generous vote-buying Public Service salary increases just before the 2006 elections, and also the military over-expenditure (more on this below).

But their saving grace was that the economy was still growing. Under Bainimarama, the economy is not growing.

Another worry for many of us is that the Military Government will even further raid the Fiji National Provident Fund, who is their captive banker and milking cow, with the board and CEO totally under their control.  

Should the Fiji economy not grow and government not repay its loans, the FNPF will become further insolvent.
Taxpayers of Fiji: note that for next year, the Budget Supplement states that you will be paying $789 million for Debt Service- this is a half of all Government Revenue.

It is no wonder than Education and Health cannot be given the increases that their ministries need and deserve (however much their ministers smile on TV and say they will manage).

Put another way, by 2013, each household in Fiji will effectively be struggling to pay for  its $20,000 share of the Public Debt, planned by this military government.
So what is the Bainimarama Government’s increase in Public Debt due to?

Monstrous Military Over-expenditure
It is confirmed now that a large chunk of the increase ($300 million)  is going to pay for the Fiji Sugar Corporation losses and “mill refit” fiasco by Bainimarama’s appointees.

But the most important increases in Public Debt are due to the continuing massive inflation and illegal over-expenditure of the military budget.

With the convenient excuse of an attempted coup (by its own soldiers), the Fiji Military Forces has been illegally over-spending the budget approved by Parliament every year since 2000- in millions: 19m, 8m, 20m, 32m, 14m, 24m, 50m (in 2007), 8m, 28m, and 24m (in 2010).
Roughly, between 2000 and 2010, the military has illegally over-spent by some $225 million– this is as much as the cost of the National Bank of Fiji disaster. All added to Fiji’s Public Debt, to be paid for by the future generations.

But the real change in military expenditure has been worse than that.  Before 2000, the military expenditure was only around $50 million.  It was only following the attempted military coup in 2000 that the Qarase Government increased the military’s budget by another ten to twenty million dollars – to contain the problems of the military’s own making.

Qarase never thought those same guns would be turned on him. So compared to the pre-2000 military budget of around $50 million, the inflation of military spending between 2000 and 2010 has cost the Fiji tax-payers roughly an extra $450 million. All added to the Public Debt.

If the current trend continues till 2014 (and the 2011 Budget indicates that it will), the military will have taken another extra $250 million from the tax-payers and added it to the Public Debt.  Or some $700 millions over and above their normal pre-2000 allocations, between 2000 and 2014.

Add or subtract a few tens of millions here and there, or allow for price changes, the picture will not change.
This $700 million more for unproductive armed soldiers in uniforms periodically conducting coups, means $700 million less for education, health, social welfare, poverty alleviation, and rural development- not to mention the massive  damage done to the economy.

Given this massive ongoing misallocation of tax-payers’ money, who cares about a few million peanuts of tax-payers’ money that this Bainimarama government is throwing at food vouchers and children’s bus fare subsidies in the 2011 Budget?

Who will pay?
Most of the Pubic Debt is being passed on to your children. But there is also the large increase in VAT from 12.5 percent to 15 percent., expected to raise $80 million.  We all know the VAT to be a regressive tax, whose burden falls more heavily on the low and middle income people who usually spend a  higher proportion of their incomes.

Which is why even Father Barr, a once avid supporter of the Bainimarama government is now complaining about the increase in VAT, as he also complains about the failure of the military government to implement his Wages Councils.

This illegal military government is also planning to sell off public assets like FEA, to try to stop the Fiscal Deficits exploding further. 

Just as the SVT government’s then Minister of Finance, Jim Ah Koy, disastrously did with the creation and sale of ATH shares in 1998, this military government will also thereby convert a public monopoly into a private monopoly, which will rip off even more, the helpless consumers, despite the best efforts of the bumbling Commerce Commission.

The IMF Excuse
How odd that this military government chooses to justify their VAT increase and sale of public assets by referring to IMF Mission advice.  This military government will also use the IMF excuse when they start sacking more public sector employees (in addition to all those over 55 laid off recently).

But the military government ignores that they could not fulfill the complete set of IMF requirements for a Standby Arrangement. We in Fiji should also understand that the experience of the developing world is that the unaccountable, non-transparent, ever-changing IMF missionaries couldn’t give tuppence for the lives of the ordinary people they trifle with.

There is no public indication that the IMF recommended that Fiji’s military expenditure must be significantly reduced to pre-2006 levels if the Fiscal Deficits and Public Debt are to be reduced to sustainable levels; nor that any burden of adjustment should be shared by the upper income brackets as well through the income tax, and not just through a VAT increase which will hurt the poorest more.

The IMF’s key concerns have always been about facilitating and strengthening the private sector, if necessary by privatising and downsizing public corporations.  For the amoral IMF missionaries, a dictatorial military government provides a grand opportunity to bring about changes not easily possible through elected accountable governments.

We should remember also that an “IMF Mission to Fiji” is a “not to be missed opportunity” for a bloated 8-person team to have a lovely few days in a tropical paradise, away from freezing Washington or far more unpleasant African banana republics which usually receive IMF attention.

Inflation and Cost of Living
This military government’s claim that they will contain inflation, is equally hollow.  Fiji’s inflation is largely imported, totally beyond the control of the government or the Commerce Commission.

Indeed, the recent Reserve Bank devaluation of the Fiji dollar boosted inflation beyond the alleged 3 percent target, while the planned 20 percent increase in VAT will add even more.

The cost of living for everyone will go up, regardless of the sporadic and generally futile Commerce Commission price controls on a limited number of items (not sold by a certain tycoon).

Father Barr’s poorest workers are certainly not going to get timely Cost of Living adjustments through the Wages Council. And the FNPF and other savings of the ordinary people will keep going down the drain, continuously eroded by the inflation, while unable to grow because of the continuing economic stagnation and lack of employment creation.

So taxpayers and coup collaborators need to honestly ask themselves: who have really profited from the 2000 and 2006 military coups?

Benefits for the Military
It is ironic that there is such hatred on the blog sites directed against Aiyaz Khaiyum who is strangely accused of implementing some kind of Taliban “Sunset Clause” on the Fijian race, and of manipulating a pliant Bainimarama.   This frequently racist blogging took another turn with Khaiyum’s presentation of the budget, on behalf of an absent sick Bainimarama.

Of course, Khaiyum invites such criticism with his egotistical “in-your-face” daily prominence in the media, his obvious enjoyment of power and authority over so many powerful ministries, and the steady stream of salusalus and adulation from the pliant business community (as long as their business interests are served, who cares if the rest of the country goes down the drain?).

But let us face it:  Khaiyum (like Parmesh Chand and Jonhn Samy) is merely in the service of Bainimarama and the Fiji Military Council, very smoothly and suavely doing their dirty work.  Indeed his performance on TV is a “revelation of sorts” even to those of us who shared a cell with him protesting the Rabuka coups  more than 20 years ago.

Of course, Khaiyum and his coup collaborating cobbers from NZ may be enjoying considerable financial benefits themselves, as others have in the past, and gone today.
But, in dollar terms, the biggest ongoing 2000 and 2006 coup beneficiaries of tax-payers funds, have been Bainimarama and his senior military officers, some of the former FMF Commanders, and the military rank and file, who have followed Bainimarama blindly into treason against a lawfully elected Government.

Note that 99 per cent of the bigger FMF beneficiaries are indigenous Fijians, who I suspect are quietly chuckling around their grog-bowl that Khaiyum (and other prominent Indo-Fijians) are egotistically taking the limelight, and the flak from the bloggers.

I suspect that when the tide turns, the Bainimarama camp and the numerous quiet indigenous Fijian coup collaborators, will blame the Indians for “misleading and manipulating Bainimarama and the Military Council”;  present a tabua or two;  perform a matanigasau or two; and the vanua will come together again, all forgiven.
Who knows where the Indo-Fijian, the Part-European and European coup collaborators will then go to.  Someone can ask them.

Epilogue for 2011 Budget Oscars
It is their personal tragedy, that all these officers and soldiers of the Fiji Military Forces, aided by the current and former Army Commanders, have now wrecked their own reputations, professionalism and marketability in the world of peace-keeping and security provision.

But the greater ongoing tragedy for Fiji, so clearly shown by this 2011 Budget, is that this Military Government and the coup collaborators are imposing a massive Public Debt burden that Fiji’s future generations will struggle to pay, undermining their standards of living for more than a decade.

Look at what is happening today to Greece, Ireland and Portugal, where Public Debt ran out of control, aided by the Global Financial Crisis.

Khaiyum may deserve an Oscar for his acting ability in presenting in the 2011 Budget, mouthing the Bainimarama government’s Roadmap and macro objectives, fully understanding that none of them are being met, or are even likely to be met, while blatantly lying about reducing Fiscal Deficits and the Public Debt.

But supporting Oscars should also go to Fiji’s business community- the tycoons, the partners and principals of the accounting firms, and the numerous collaborating Flotsam and Jetsam from abroad, for merrily playing along and even praising this dangerous 2011 Budget (the images on Fiji One are revealing).

Unfortunately, the economic and social disaster that this military government is visiting on Fiji through the 2011 Budget is not in the “make-believe” world of Hollywood Oscars, also seen so often on our TV screens.

Fiji’s young workers and children will learn that harsh message one day, when the Public Debt chickens come home to roost. Is there anyone in the Fiji Civil Service who can explain all this to the Bainimarama government before further damage is done?

Labels: ,

WikiLeaks: Comm Secretariat 'dithered' over Fiji expulsion

LEAKED CABLE: Amitav Banerji (middle)

The Australian:  A Commonwealth working group dithered over a decision to expel Fiji despite pressure from New Zealand, a leaked US embassy cable shows.  

The June 2009 cable, part of a 250,000 document dump by WikiLeaks, records the frustration of Commonwealth Secretariat director of political affairs Amitav Banerji at the passing of a May deadline for the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group to decide whether to fully suspend Fiji.

Richard Mills, political counsellor at the US embassy in London, reported Banerji expressed his concerns that CMAG had not yet met to discuss Fiji.

Banerji said the Commonwealth's credibility could be damaged if it did not make a decision as promised. He said New Zealand strongly supported a move to suspend Fiji over the Frank Bainimarama-led junta's refusal to return the nation to democratic rule. 

But Malaysia resisted the move because of concerns Fiji might unilaterally quit the Commonwealth, Mills said. Fiji was finally fully suspended in September last year.

Labels: ,

Regime to review lease agreements of other companies after Fiji Water u-turn

More changes are heralded after the ruckus over Fiji Water, with the illegal regime now wanting to ping other overseas companies leasing land in Fiji.

Thanks to the hurried u-turn by the American company, the regime is looking to review what major companies are paying in leases.

Illegal leader Frank Bainimarama is quoted in Fiji Broadcasting Corporation today as saying many companies in Fiji are making huge profits but paying little for the privilege of doing business in the country.

Fiji Water was used as an example, with him saying the company is paying "$11,000 in lease, an increase of just $5,000 since 1995, when it used to pay $6,000."

He made it clear the regime would review lease agreements and move to improve the situation.

Payments for the leases are made with landowners from what we know, so it's clear the regime will be setting new edicts regardless of existing deals with landowners.

The looming review of leases come as the claim Fiji Water is engaging in transfer pricing continues to raise questions.

The regime says the company is selling the water at an artificially low price by on-selling it to its sister company. 

According to some, the claim is baseless because marketing costs are huge, especially for water in North America, where a very pure, safe product is available free from the taps. As one reader says "The only thing harder would be to sell ice to Eskimos."

But the regime must either already have the proof or should front up with it. Is Golden Manufacturers Limited understating the cost of the cartons? Are the plastic bottles bought from a related party at an artificially low price? How is the transfer pricing being done?

This would be a routine job for FIRCA, who could use well-established international guidelines for assessing 'real' costs. If Fiji Water didn't meet the guidelines they could take them to court and order payment of higher taxes.

It's probably what that icon of integrity, Mahendra Chaudhry, was doing before the regime's case was stalled, no doubt when it was realised that FIRCA couldn't establish the facts.

Ironically, Aiyaz Sayed Khaiyum's too clever work with the Commerce Commission to control prices of food probably means the regime has set very low benchmarks for business costs in Fiji.

Footnote: Statements about Fiji Water and the budget since Monday have all been attributed to Dictator Bainimarama but there have been no current pictures from what we've seen  accompanying his comments. A short time ago someone posted this comment on his Facebook: "Bainimarama had a stroke? Thats what the coconut wireless is saying around my neighbourhood."

Labels: