#header-inner img {margin: 0 auto !important; #header-inner {text-align: Center ;} Fiji Coupfourpointfive: India link to Fiji Minister's $2million deposit

Thursday, September 15, 2011

India link to Fiji Minister's $2million deposit

Fiji Sun Sunday, February 17, 2008

Political sympathisers channelled money through Sydney consulate

The Government of India’s Consulate General in Sydney acted as a conduit to secretly channel over half a million dollars into an interim Cabinet minister’s private bank account in Australia in 2002 that was collected by his  
political sympathisers in India, according to the Minister’s tax file. The same political sympathisers also, separately, on two different occasions, in 2000 and 2001, transacted nearly one million dollars into the Minister’s same bank account in Australia. 

The transaction linking the Consulate to the movement of funds from India to Australia was confirmed by the Minister’s own delegated tax agent, a Suva based chartered accountants, who notified FIRCA, Fiji Inland Revenue and Customs Authority, on November 15, 2004 that, “The taxpayer (the Minister) received funds amounting to A$514,148.50 on 15 April 2002 from Consulate General which was deposited in Cash Management Call Account maintained by him with Commonwealth Bank, Australia (Refer statement 31 in attached Schedule 4).”

An Indian parliamentarian of a leading political party also confirmed the role of the Indian Consulate-General in a letter to the Minister on 9 September 2004, in response to the Minister’s letter of enquiry about “the details of the funds”. The Indian parliamentarian had written to the Minister in Hindi (later translated for FIRCA into English): “The total amounting to nearly AUD fifteen lakhs was sent to you with the help of Government of India through its Consulate General in Sydney. We sent AUD 503,000/- as first instalment in the year 2000. In 2001, AUD 486,890/- was sent and then in 2002 AUD 514,148 was sent”.

The statements provided by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia confirm that $503,000 was deposited into the Minister’s private bank account on November 1, 2000; $486,890 on February 22, 2001; and $514,148.50 by the Indian Consulate-General on April 15, 2002.

The funds had been collected, according to the Indian parliamentarian’s letter, for the Minister’s settlement in Australia. A committee formed on his behalf by the parliamentarian and others in India had wanted the Minister to leave Fiji because it was not safe for him (the Minister) in the country. FIRCA, therefore, found there was no evidence that the money was intended for the Minister’s community in Fiji, and he was therefore told to pay up his tax. The Minister had claimed that the money was kept for his community. He could not also furnish a trust deed to back up his claim, and the fact that the bank account was solely held in his name.

In 2004, FIRCA found that the Minister had not submitted his tax returns for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003. He was later assessed and slapped with a $120,000 tax bill. He was also found not to have disclosed the interest of $A25,233 that he had earned on his Australian bank balance.

In the course of its investigation, FIRCA’s Income Matching Unit (IMU) became aware of his bank accounts in Australia and New Zealand and, on May 11, 2004, wrote to him advising him that they had received information from surveys and banks and financial institutions that he was in receipt of income, which had either not been declared or under declared.

In accordance with the provisions of Section 50(5) of the Income Tax Act Cap 201, he was asked to furnish details of (a) interest earned on all private bank accounts operated by him and his family, both in Fiji and overseas from the year ending December 31, 1998 up until December 31, 2002; copies of rental agreement from year 1998 to 2002; copies of any certificate of dividends received from 1998 to 2002; and a copy of the trust deed. He was given 14 days to make representation to FIRCA on receipt of the letter.

On May 18, 2004, the Minister wrote to IMU informing that interest on bank accounts earned in Fiji had been declared in his tax returns. Members of his family who were taxpayers filed their own returns and invited FIRCA to enquire from them. He said he did not have any rental agreements with any person or organisation that earned him any income. The Minister said he did not receive any dividends as he was not a shareholder in any company and he did not hold any trust deeds. What about the moneys abroad? The Minister claimed: “In so far as interest from moneys held in accounts abroad are concerned, please be advised that these have not been brought to Fiji but remain re-invested in the accounts there.”

On June 3, 2004, the IMU pointed out to the Minister that he had amassed interest and dividends for the year ending 2002 of $29,606.84 and there was a discrepancy of the same amount. On the margins of the Minister’s May 18, 2004 letter, certain questions were raised, and the same were later repeated in a letter to the Minister on June 15, 2004. The letter re-iterated that he was required to clarify queries with copies of documentary evidence: (a) the source of funds invested offshore; (b) when did he first invest these monies; (c) details of interest earned from when he first invested; and (d) copies of bank statements and documentary evidences of any tax deducted at source.

The next day, June 16, the Minister wrote asking for an extension of time to provide the information because “old records will need to be looked up to obtain the details”, and that the banks had requested more time be given. He also disclosed that he had some travel and parliamentary commitments and therefore asked if he could be given until August 15, 2004 to furnish the details. FIRCA granted him the requested extension. On August 14, the chartered accountancy firm wrote to FIRCA notifying it that the Minister had appointed the accountancy firm to act as his tax agent. The firm asked for further extension till September 15, 2004, which was granted.

On September 3, 2004, representatives from the accountancy firm visited FIRCA and wanted to know the information that was needed by the tax organisation. They were referred to the letter of June 16, and informed that FIRCA was after the most important detail, and that was “the source of the income”. The accountancy firm stated that the information would be submitted by September 15, 2004.

But on September 13, it again wrote to FIRCA asking for further extension until October 15, prompting FIRCA to warn the firm that no further extension would be granted. However, considering that the firm was still awaiting confirmations from the Minister, it agreed to the extension but stressed that, “Please be advised that information gathered and “on hand” by your client should be submitted by that date”.

On October 4, 2004 the accountancy firm wrote to FIRCA enclosing details of the income earned by the Minister for the periods based on the documents provided by the banks together with summary of income and withholding taxes deducted at source including: (a) dividend income from Perpetual Investments, Australia; (b) interest income from ANZ, New Zealand; (c) income received from Commonwealth Balanced Fund; (d) interest income from Commonwealth Bank, Australia; (e) income from Colonial First State Investments Limited.

On behalf of the Minister, they stated that, “We advise that above income were not included in the tax returns as these contributions and income there from were sourced and earned overseas and the relevant withholding taxes on the income are deducted at source”. The capital contributions being the deposits in the bank account in the form of donations, they argued, were received from non-residents and attached were the relevant confirmations – the Indian parliamentarian’s letter to the Minister about the transfer of funds.

On October 5, 2004, FIRCA officials met with one of the accountants and according to FIRCA’s office memo they identified details of bank accounts, confirmation of the letter from the parliamentarian that the money was raised in India for the Minister, and that half a million dollars was transacted through the Indian Consulate-General in Sydney. One FIRCA officer observed on the office memo: “Transmitted to Australia – How?” and regarding the parliamentarian’s letter: “More substantive evidence to support the lttr.”

On October 22, 2004, FIRCA wrote to the accountancy firm regarding the October 5 meeting and for the submission of information the firm had “on hand” at the meeting. FIRCA informed them that they (FIRCA) had examined the documents and would be amending the income tax returns for the respective years. However, they would not be allowing the tax credits due to lack of documentary evidence.

FIRCA also emphasised that despite it amending the returns, the tax organisation would still be pursuing the “source of the funds” issue. “The document submitted explaining the source of the funds is not sufficient enough for our purposes,” it stressed. It, therefore, requested the chartered accountancy firm to forward documentary evidences – (a) details of remittances from India to Australia; (b) details of withholding tax deducted; (c) and as requested in their letter of 15 June 2004, the copies of bank statements. A copy of the letter was also forwarded to the Minister. On November 10, 2004, the Minister paid $86,069.02 in outstanding income tax for 2000.

On November 22, 2004, one of the partners in the accountancy firm replied to the letter, confirming the payment of $86,069.02, noting that, “The tax paid by our client includes 2004 provisional tax amounting to F$34,962”. He also pointed out: “We note that credit for non-resident withholding tax deducted at source amounting to $22,858.03 has not been considered by Inland Revenue.” The accountant also enclosed summary details of the non-resident withholding tax deducted by banks and institutions in Australia and New Zealand together with copies of the bank statements evidencing the deduction of tax at sources for the years 2000 to 2003 in relation to investment companies etc.

In the same letter, the accountant also admitted the payment by the Indian Consulate General of $514,148.50 into the Minister’s Cash Management Call account in the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. He also requested FIRCA to make the necessary amendments for the years 2000 to 2003 and the Statement of Tax Account to include credits for the non-resident withholding tax amounting to $22,858.03.

The documents provided by the accountancy firm to FIRCA reveal that the Minister had opened the Cash Management Call account in the Commonwealth Bank of Sydney branch at Ryde. On August 8, 1997, he had an opening balance of $A58.16 in his name. Three years later, on August 10, 2000, he made a deposit of $13,001into that account, and four days later, on August 12, $502.80.

Between 2000 and 2003 he made further deposits as follows: $503,000 (fund from India), $486,890 (fund from India), $8,461.00 (possibly also fund from India for it has the same transfer code), $79,330.89, $10,000, $6,000, $514,148.50 (through Consulate-General), $378,978.18, $46,000, $50,000, $10,00 and $47,398.37.

Naturally, between October 10, 2000 and March 20, 2003, the Minister also made a series of small and large withdrawals towards property and other expenses such as spending money in camera, hardware, electrical, shoe and food shops, the purchase of airline tickets from Qantas and at Sydney’s international duty free shop. Between October 10, 2000 and March 20, 2003, he withdrew as follows: $6000, $6,800, $400,000, $400,00, $55,000, $10,000, $6,000, $7,266.10, $38,000, $100,000, $25,825.89, $30,030, $469,000, $380,000, $46,000, $50,000, $6,000, $8,000, and $5,000.

In June 2001, the Minister gave an address in Sydney as his contact address but in October 2001 he changed it to a close relative’s address in another part of a Sydney suburb as his home and correspondence address. He also gave his daughter $50,000 as gift, and it has also emerged that a close relative of his also bought a house for $300,000, paying cash for the property.

Meanwhile, on receipt of information from different sources, FIRCA’s investigating officers were instructed to verify the original sources of all investment deposits into the Minister’s Australian bank account, details of bank withdrawals, a thorough analysis of some withdrawals below $5,000, confirmation of all assets of the Minister in Australia, a check to establish whether there were any violations of the Fiji Foreign Exchange Act, and finally to audit his tax file to ascertain the true financial wealth of the interim Cabinet Minister.

The December 5, 2006 coup, carried out to stamp out rampant corruption, cut short FIRCA’s investigation into establishing the truth about the real financial worth of the minister.
There is no evidence that his community in Fiji benefited from the $2million that was collected in India and secretly channelled into his private bank account through the Indian Consulate-General in Sydney.

And in June 2007, the Interim Cabinet Minister had still owed $57,672.09 in taxes to FIRCA.


Jone said...

Oh well one wonders how much money Bainivuaka has in overseas bank accounts. Bainivuaka, if you're reading this, you will be found out. And when you do, you will shet your pants, just like when you shet your pants while being drunk.

Anonymous said...

A man who could not stay faithful to his own wife can offer no loyalty to others !! Time has proved that this man has no ethics, principles or morals. So sad to see that a small island nation has been toiled around by political pimps like MC. Everyday a little hope fades away that Fiji will ever see the light of day !!!

Anonymous said...

The Indian Consulate in Australia should be reported to ANNA HARARE. I will do this--he will go on another fast until the truth comes out .ANNA HARARE---you are my hero----not Amitabh Bachan.

mark manning said...

Goodness !
So what was the money from india for, who did the money come from initially, what was the purpose of the money given to Chaudhry, what would the Indian government do if it thought it's donation had been misused for anything other than its stated purpose, is someone in either India or australia guilty of a crime regarding these transfers of such large amounts of cash to a private Bank Account, were the Deposits, loans or gifts or for an entirely different purpose, was it a coincidence that the coup took place before FIRCA could finalise its Investigation into chaudhry's Financial Worth, did chaudhry have a hand in the coup, was tax payable in fact on these donations, was the money intended for the indian ?community in fiji and if yes, what does the indian community in fiji think about it being withheld and misspent or not having being spent at all but left in a Chaudhry's Private Account collecting Interest, when did Aiyaz and Frank know of all this, why was it Mr.Qarase they went after knowing that chaudhry had questionable funds in his Account, what now ?

Will FIRCA go after Regime Members post coup with the same gusto and determination they have gone after Chaudhry and Qarase and are they currently Investigating the Financial dealings etc. of Aiyaz and Frank ?

Anonymous said...

Pls frica/ficac /police can you investigate bai/ask and ministers and cronies in fnpf natadola/momi/fsc/road work contract given to china/malaysia company deals.
be fair if you charge mpc/lq


OK so the money was given to him for his personal use by his friends in India, and the money never entered Fiji, why is he getting taxed for this?

Sounds like he is the victim here, no?

Maybe I am misunderstanding something. If so, someone please explain it to me.

Anonymous said...

All the thieves - shall we leave them all?

Afterall they are our honourable representatives!!

Anonymous said...

1.Fiji Citizens have to pay taxes. MPC is no exception.
2. Qarase was gunning for him, and why not. MPC was and is a big hypocrit.
3. These FACTS show why MPC and his tail the Fiji Labour Party jumped into bed with Frank.
4. What can you expect from HIT & RUN MPC.
5 Don't worry, MPC will be back again at the next elections.
Greed and Power has no limit.

Smelly Pooh said...

I say throw them all in jail. I am sick and tired of all the BS going on in Fiji. What happened to this beautiful country?

I must confess on how people like the Tappoos are the biggest conman and corrupt guys they are. The entire family needs to be thrown in jail. All of them.


More to come on Monday on Chaudhry's millions. The truth about it all. Too much has been speculated by Chaudhry and many of us here. I will give the real picture for all next Monday.

A long story but a complete story.


Anonymous said...

The man has paid all taxes due and monies were a donation.

Remember he was hostage for 56 days and let Victor Lal be a hostage for 5 days and see how he feels.

There is no proceeds of crime and he will win his case.

This is politic-dictator wants to gail all oppostion to win election.

Anonymous said...

the topic is m c not tappoo

Anonymous said...

@11:45 PM. The theme is corruption.

vikaryan said...

precisely smelly pooh. tappoos are the most corrupt family in fiji. and they ALL must be put away.

Anonymous said...

11.45pm....not sure who your comment is for?

Anonymous said...

leave mc alone victor lal
he has done so much for the country
what have you done apart from sitting in the comforts of the UK and mouthing off like a granny

Anonymous said...

Agree with Anon 16/9 @ 12.11pm, why is Victor Lal trying to shoot a man who is already down? It is cowardly behavior. Back off, otherwise, come to Fiji and get your hands dirty. Records prove that all our political leaders are not free from accusation for corruptive practice so why the focus on Chaudhry now?

Anonymous said...

MC has done nothing positive for Fiji. He has only succeeded in dividing the country and looking after his pocket.

Anonymous said...

He and his FLP voted for Rabuka to be PM ahead of Kamikamica . Rabuka was given open liscense to implement his FIji for everyone except Indians policy.
THANKS TO MC- Indians will now be always second class in civil service
regardless of performance etc

Anonymous said...

Keep functioning ,terrific job!

Here is my web blog :: pispiweb.no-ip.org
Here is my homepage :: 2011 federal income tax rates personal

Anonymous said...

There are certainly a

variety of details like that to take into consideration.

That could

be a nice level to carry up. I provide the ideas above as

common inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you

convey up the place an important factor

will be working in honest good faith. I

don?t know if best practices have emerged round
things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly recognized as a good game.
Each boys

and girls really feel the influence of just a second’s

pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

My web blog iytywnm.blogspot.ru
My page :: carp fishing holidays

Anonymous said...

Throughout this great design of things you actually receive a B- with regard to effort.

where you misplaced us ended up being in all the facts. As
they say, the devil is in the details... And it couldn't be

much more true at this point. Having said that,

permit me inform you exactly what

did give good results. The writing

is definitely highly

engaging and this is most likely why

I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of

doing that. Secondly, although I can easily notice the jumps in reason you come up with, I am not sure of exactly how you appear to

connect the details which inturn make

your conclusion. For the moment I shall subscribe to your point but hope in the foreseeable future you link the facts better.

my homepage - abama tenerife ritz carlton tripadvisor
Feel free to visit my webpage ; 4 letter words starting with q and ending with f

Anonymous said...

Virtually all of the

things you mention is supprisingly

precise and it makes me wonder why I had not

looked at this with this light previously. Your article
truly did

switch the light on for me as far as this specific topic
goes. But there is just one issue I am not too comfy with

so while I make an effort to reconcile that with the core theme of the point, allow me
see what all the

rest of your subscribers have to point out.

Very well done.

Also visit my blog post; http://thelearningprofessor.blogspot.ru/2011/09/website-spotlight-conquistadors.html
Have a look at my web blog property in Elche

Unknown said...

No country is corruption free today!! CommonWealth Bank in Sydney